| |
An Automated Gas Filling System
A major Gas company required the conversion and updating of its
gas cylinder filling systems globally. A contract to undertake this
task was given to a major systems integration company "Dickinson
Autocon" Pty Ltd Based in Sydney. Fast Automation was subcontracted
to assist in this project.
Scope of the main project:
The main project entailed the design, development and implementation
of a secure and maintainable control system, to automate the mixing
and filling of gas to an unlimited number of recipes. This encompassed
the electrical & software design through to commissioning. The
system had to be compatible with an existing complex algorithm for
filling volatile gasses. The system also had to be flexible and
generically applied to widely differing filling plants without code
changes.
Fast Automation’s part:
The customer supplied a URS for each plant- from this Fast Automation
undertook the following:
- Process Design Specification – Containing drawings and
in a very controlled syntax text for describing the Stepping logic
& procedures required of the filling system
- Generation of an FDS (Functional Design Specification) - this
document was extensive and contained very detailed information
on every step of the process, all software functions, Graphical
screen dumps, report examples, recipe structure, parameter listings
etc as well as the system architecture and hardware to be used.
- Generation of SCADA Application – including, plant mimics,
live device profiles, recipe handling, reports, alarms annunciation
and logging, security policy, command prompts for instructing
operator actions, custom auto barcode label printing software
etc.
- Generation of Simulation application - to allow full simulation
of the complete system off site.
- PLC Programming - Heavy monitoring and assistance in the PLC
programming to the FDS & PDS including complete coding of
various code modules. Setting up and testing of OMRON’s
CLK DataLink network to allow PLC’s to share memory areas.
- Production of STS Software Test Specification - this contained
the plan for the testing including the systems to be utilized
and the methodology.
- Automation Support Document – this extensive document
described how to perform future tasks such as replacing the PLC
program, troubleshooting faults, rebuilding SCADA PC’s and
how to configure the software for each plant.
- Commissioning of 2 early plants.
- Generation of SCR – Site Commissioning Reports to control
& document the successful commissioning of each plant in a
safe manner.
Project statistics:
| Number of Change Notes during FAT: |
64 |
| Days on FAT: |
20 |
| Number of Change Notes during SAT: |
9 |
| Days on SAT: |
4 – 10 per site |
| Number of documentation reviews: |
6 |
| Number of progress meetings: |
7 |
| Duration of Project: |
6 Months |
| Human resources involved: |
6 |
| Technology used: |
Wonderware Intouch, Microsoft Visual Basic, OMRON CJ1H PLC's
with a CLK Network |
The project presented a number of challenges: The Que system was
very complex and required searching ahead of recipes to allow filling
of the same gas to different locations to be done in parallel but
only under strict conditions. SCADA requirements were unique in
that the whole application changed graphically and functionally
between sites but used the same code with different configuration
options set – this was a very valuable synergy suggested and
introduced to the project by Fast Automation. The reporting was
very extensive with different levels of reports required per gas
filling module, per operator, per Fill, per shift etc. The Alarm’s
handling was extensive and the history sorted per logical area.
Every action was monitored all control is closed loop – with
a back up loop. The Recipe handling allowed for unlimited ordering
of procedures and setting of procedure step parameter sub steps,
but with different rules for each plant. Then the actual filling
of gases that behave differently both at different pressures and
different temperatures was always the main challenge of the system,
the parameters of control are then all different again for each
gas type! and each gas combination. For example adding CO2 cools
a mixture most other gases increase the temperature so the control
loops must cope with this. The commissioning window of the whole
system – electrics and software was only 4 days Friday to
Monday with filling to resume on Tuesday.
Summary:
This project was a unanimous success and resulted in all objectives
being met. The systems & knowledge developed are valuable to
all projects that require very flexible recipe handing, short downtime
/ changeover and full offsite simulation.


|
|